Loading match analysis…
Loading match analysis…
EredivisiePartial
Sunday 8 November at 18:15 WIB
| Pick | Model | Market | Sportmonks |
|---|---|---|---|
| SC Heerenveen win | 27.9% | 21.5% | 38.1% |
| Draw | 20.8% | 21.7% | 23.8% |
| Feyenoord win | 51.3% | 56.8% | 38.1% |
| SC Heerenveen or draw | 48.7% | — | 61.9% |
| SC Heerenveen or Feyenoord | 79.2% | — | 76.2% |
| Draw or Feyenoord | 72.1% | — | 62.0% |
| Over 1.5 goals | 88.2% | — | 83.4% |
| Under 1.5 goals | 11.8% | — | 16.6% |
| Over 2.5 goals | 71.2% | 68.1% | 63.8% |
| Under 2.5 goals | 28.8% | 31.9% | 36.2% |
| Over 3.5 goals | 50.2% | — | 42.5% |
| Under 3.5 goals | 49.8% | — | 57.5% |
| Both teams to score | 69.4% | — | 64.6% |
| Not both teams to score | 30.6% | — | 35.4% |
| SC Heerenveen to score | 78.7% | — | 74.2% |
| Feyenoord to score | 88.2% | — | 73.9% |
Sources disagree by more than 10 points on 5 picks.
Market odds captured Saturday 7 November at 19:38 WIB · 1xBet.
Sportmonks panel Saturday 7 November at 17:27 WIB.
Home goals down, away goals across.
| 0 | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 0 | 2.5% | 5.4% | 5.7% | 4.1% | 2.2% | 0.9% |
| 1 | 3.9% | 8.3% | 8.9% | 6.3% | 3.4% | 1.4% |
| 2 | 3.0% | 6.4% | 6.9% | 4.9% | 2.6% | 1.1% |
| 3 | 1.6% | 3.3% | 3.5% | 2.5% | 1.3% | 0.6% |
| 4 | 0.6% | 1.3% | 1.4% | 1.0% | 0.5% | 0.2% |
| 5 | 0.2% | 0.4% | 0.4% | 0.3% | 0.2% | 0.1% |
Shown 0–5 goals per side, from the full 11×11 matrix.
Expected goals 1.55 – 2.14. Correlation 0.00.
Ratings from primary_league.
This league is partly calibrated — treat its numbers with care.
This fixture is served by the Sportmonks fit for its league.
Calculated Saturday 7 November at 21:33 WIB.
Scored 14 · Conceded 4
Scored 7 · Conceded 10
SC Heerenveen: +1.35 per game vs xG — Overperforming.
Across 5 games: scored 12 on 10.56 xG, conceded 4 on 9.33 xG against.
Feyenoord: −1.06 per game vs xG — Underperforming.
Across 6 games: scored 7 on 12.28 xG, conceded 10 on 8.90 xG against.
Note: SC Heerenveen are overperforming against xG while Feyenoord are underperforming — recent results and the numbers disagree here.
No picks recorded for this package
This package was calculated before the pick engine wrote to the ledger, or no pick cleared the grade threshold.